IRAQ WAR TODAY
Keep Your Helmet On!




Be A Part of a Tribute to Fallen Heroes - Help Build the Fallen Soldiers' Bike
Help support the families of our deployed Heroes - Visit Soldiers' Angels' Operation Outreach
Help Our Heroes Help Others - Click Here to visit SOS: KIDS
Nominate your Hero for IWT's "Hero of the Month" - click here for details!
Search Iraq War Today only

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

ACORN and the Census

Call me a cynic, but could this just maybe be related to our current President's push to move the Census under the direction of the White House?

ACORN to Play Role in 2010 Census

The U.S. Census is supposed to be free of politics, but one group with a history of voter fraud, ACORN, is participating in next year's count, raising concerns about the politicization of the decennial survey.

The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now signed on as a national partner with the U.S. Census Bureau in February 2009 to assist with the recruitment of the 1.4 million temporary workers needed to go door-to-door to count every person in the United States -- currently believed to be more than 306 million people.

A U.S. Census "sell sheet," an advertisement used to recruit national partners, says partnerships with groups like ACORN "play an important role in making the 2010 Census successful," including by "help[ing] recruit census workers."

The bureau is currently employing help from more than 250 national partners, including TARGET and the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), to assist in the hiring effort.

But ACORN's partnership with the 2010 Census is worrisome to lawmakers who say past allegations of fraud should raise concerns about the organization...


Naaaaah...just coincidence, I'm sure.

Full article here.

Labels: , ,

Monday, March 02, 2009

Same Old, Same Old

More proof that the only "change" we can "hope" for with this Administration is some in our pocket once the goverment is done taxing us into oblivion:

Obama Will Sign Spending Bill Despite Earmarks

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama will break a campaign pledge and sign a budget bill laden with millions in lawmakers' pet projects, administration officials said.

Administration budget chief Peter Orszag and White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel both downplayed the $410 billion spending bill and signaled Obama would hold his nose and sign it. Orszag said: "We want to just move on. Let's get this bill done, get it into law and move forward.

Said Emanuel: "That's last year's business."

The House last week passed the measure that would keep the government running through Sept. 30, when the federal budget year ends. Taxpayers for Common Sense, a watchdog group, identified almost 8,600 specially sponsored projects totaling $7.7 billion; Democrats say the number is $3.8 billion.

Either way, it is far more than Obama promised as a candidate. He refused "earmarks" for the economic stimulus package he championed and a children's health bill.
Now we'll see if his fan club is willing to hold him accountable.

Full story is here.

Labels: , ,

Friday, February 06, 2009

Beyond the Pale

There just aren't words for how angry this one makes me:



Charges Dropped Against USS Cole Bombing Suspect

The senior military judge overseeing terror trials at Guantanamo Bay has dropped charges against a suspect in the 2000 USS Cole bombing.

The legal move by the Hon. Susan J. Crawford upholds President Obama's Guantanamo order to halt court proceedings at the Navy detention center in Cuba.
The military charges against suspected Al Qaeda bomber Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri marked the last active war crimes case at Guantanamo Bay.

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said Crawford dismissed the charges against al-Nashiri without prejudice. That means new charges can be brought again later. He will remain in prison for the time being.

"It was her decision, but it reflects the fact that the president has issued an executive order which mandates that the military commissions be halted, pending the outcome of several reviews of our operations down at Guantanamo," Morrell said Thursday night.

The full, disgusting story is here.

I guess it's OK to allow the murderers of our military Heroes to go unpunished - just so long as we don't make the terrorists feel bad.

Welcome to "Hope and Change," folks.

Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Nutjob Rides Again...

Obama's lovely remarks to Al Arabiya, whereby he echoed the Leftist refrain of "It's all America's fault," have prompted a new round of lunacy from our favorite wacko:

Ahmadinejad Demands Apology for U.S. 'Crimes'
Wednesday, January 28, 2009

TEHRAN, Iran — Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad called for "profound changes" in U.S. foreign policy on Wednesday, including giving up support for Israel, during an address to thousands of people in the western city of Kermanshah.

President Obama on Tuesday, in an interview with Arabic television, called for more dialogue with Iran to express difference and see "where there are potential avenues for progress."

Without mentioning President Barack Obama by name, Ahmadinejad Wednesday repeatedly referred to those who want to bring "change," a word used often in Obama's election campaign, and indicated that Iran would be looking to see if there would be substantive differences in U.S. policy.

"We welcome change but on condition that change is fundamental and on the right track," Ahmadinejad said. "When they say 'we want to make changes', change can happen in two ways. First is a fundamental and effective change... The second ... is a change of tactics."

Ahmadinejad also demanded the U.S. apologize for 'crimes' committed against Iran; specifically, criticizing and trying to block their nuclear program.
Funny, but I don't hear any calls for Iran to apologize for its crimes. And there are still those who insist that Mahmoud has some apologizing of his own to do.

Sadly, with the new administration, Mad Mahmoud might just get what he wants.

The full story is here.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

And So it Begins...

Well, one thing's for sure - he's not wasting time.

Obama Administration Moves to Halt Guantanamo Trials

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba -- Military judges on Wednesday will consider motions by the Obama administration to suspend the Guantanamo war crimes trials for 120 days during a review of the system for prosecuting suspected terrorists.

The motions, filed late Tuesday at the direction of President Barack Obama and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, will be heard in the cases of five men charged in the Sept. 11 attacks and of Canadian Omar Khadr, who is accused of killing an American soldier with a grenade in Afghanistan in 2002.

Read the Rest
PHOTOS

Labels: , , , , , ,

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Sunday, January 18, 2009

How's This for Change?

Wish I could say I was surprised:

Feds Say Obama Prayer Leader Is From Group Linked to Hamas

Ingrid Mattson, president of the Islamic Society of North America, is the leader of a group that federal prosecutors say has ties to terrorists.

A Muslim scholar chosen to speak at President-elect Barack Obama's inaugural prayer service Wednesday is the leader of a group that federal prosecutors say has ties to terrorists.

Ingrid Mattson, president of the Islamic Society of North America, is one of many religious leaders scheduled to speak at the prayer service at Washington's National Cathedral.

Mattson has been the guest of honor at State Department dinners and has met with senior Pentagon officials during the Bush administration. She also spoke at a prayer service at the Democratic National Convention in Denver. Mattson, who was elected president of the society in 2006, is a professor of Islamic studies at Hartford Seminary in Hartford, Conn.

But in 2007 and as recently as last July, federal prosecutors in Dallas filed court documents linking the Plainfield, Ind.-based Islamic society to the group Hamas, which the U.S. considers a terrorist organization.

Neither Mattson nor her organization have been charged. But prosecutors wrote in July that they had "a wide array of testimonial and documentary evidence expressly linking" the group to Hamas and other radical groups.

Linda Douglass, a spokeswoman for Obama's inaugural committee, would not discuss the case or say whether the committee knew about it.

"She has a stellar reputation in the faith community," Douglass said Saturday night.

The existence of the court documents was first reported by
Politico.

Read the Rest

Labels: , , , , ,

Sunday, December 07, 2008

Dear B-HO: Where's the Proof?

Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution reads: "No Person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States."

There are numerous questions as to Obama's citizen status raising suspicion and doubt about Obama constitutional qualification to be president. To settle these questions Mr. Obama must produce proof of citizenship!

Documents that must be produced include;
(a) a certified copy of "vault" (original long version) birth certificate;
(b) certified copies of all reissued and sealed birth certificates in the names Barack Hussein Obama, Barry Soetoro, Barry Obama, Barack Dunham and Barry Dunham;
(c) a certified copy Certification of Citizenship;
(d) a certified copy Oath of Allegiance taken upon age of maturity;
(e) certified copies of admission forms for Occidental College, Columbia University and Harvard Law School; and
(f) certified copies of any court orders or legal documents changing his name from Barry Soetoro.

It is reasonable that these documents should be produced considering that his father is Kenyan, his adoptive father is Indonesian, and his grandmother claims to have been present at his birth in Kenya. If he is a natural born citizen then producing these documents should not be any problem.

These allegations will not go away until Mr. Obama produces proof to federal authorities and the public. If he will not do so voluntarily he must be compelled by every means available. You, as an employee of The People, have sworn an oath to support and defend the Constitution.

We The People are demanding you to make every effort, both public and private, to resolve this fundamental Constitutional question before 20 January.



Sign the Petition

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

Welcome to the U.S.S.A.

The oppressed are allowed once every few years to decide
which particular representatives of the oppressing class
are to represent and repress them."-- Karl Marx


Well, it's over. The people have spoken, and they've chosen Socialism. The country we had is not the country we have. I know that some may accuse me of being melodramatic, but the election of Barack Obama represents a fundamental, critical, potentially fatal shift in our government. Both the winner and the loser talked of bringing the country together. However, the manners in which those opposing philosophies would seek to do so couldn't be more different.

Harry Reid referred to last night's vote as "a mandate for change." Given the numbers, the vote was far from a mandate - many states were quite close. Frighteningly, those margins were well within the danger area of the numbers of fraudulent voters reported in some areas. And the election was far from smooth - from Black Panthers with nightsticks, to broken machines (one of them in my town), to wet ballots causing a problem, there were a significant number of issues. And forget the military vote - many of those won't count. John McCain had talked of suing to try and make sure those were counted, but that seems unlikely.

There is some theoretically good news - it appears that the Democrats will be short of the 60 seats they needed to have complete power, but then again, that only means that every failure will be blamed on the Republicans. And as of right now, it looks like Al Franken lost. The race has been called, but the margin is extremely thin, so who knows.

The most nauseating story is that John Murtha keeps his seat. A man who called our Marines cold-blooded murderers, who called Pennsylvanians racists, remains in Congress. The one Republican Senator in New England - Chris Shays from my state of CT - was not so lucky.

If you take away the close margins, and you accept the vote as legitimate, the victory is pretty numerically significant. Voter turnout was extremely high, and the electoral margin was large. As far as making history goes, though, I don't see it the same way as most of the media does. They call it a great victory because he's an African American. I don't see progress in that. Many people voted for him because of his race; some undoubtedly voted against him because of his race. How is that progress? How is that success? Far better would it have been to have seen the vote completely ignore his race. Far more indicative of progress would it have been to see this campaign be absent of any factors other than the content of character, and the values of the platform. This has not been the case.

At any rate, this country has chosen the most liberal Senator we have as President, and number three as Vice President. So liberal, in fact, that voters have happily, knowingly, chosen Socialism. At best, we'll have a President who talks a good game, has high approval ratings, but accomplishes little while blaming it on the party in the minority. At best, we'll have a Congress that talks and talks of fixing problems, but enacts only window-dressing legislation, and takes no risks in a desire to protect its butt at all costs. At best, we'll be looking at a controlled withdrawal from Iraq before things are completed, but without tragic consequences. At worst, we could be looking at the Fairness Doctrine, Universal Healthcare, historic tax increases, and another generation of Heroes who are treated as if they lost a war despite the military realities.

The Progressives rule now - White House, Congress, and in all likelihood, they'll soon rule the Supreme Court, too. Let's face facts - Progressive is the name the Socialists chose for themselves when they realized years ago that no one would vote for someone who called themselves a Socialist (not sure that's the case now). So we have now become a Socialist country - the United Socialist States of America. Welcome to it. And so you're not surprised when you see what we're in for, here's what Socialists believe: (opens in new window)


"In a higher phase of communist society... only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be fully left behind and society inscribe on its banners: from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs." -- Karl Marx

True socialists advocate a complete lack of societal class. Everyone is equal, and the government controls all production and distribution - in order, of course, to eliminate the evil of competition, and to ensure that no one is any more successful than anyone else. Everyone is equal - except, of course, for those in power.

But they go further than everyone within a country being equal. True Socialists seek to make everyone equal, and see this as transcending race, religion, gender, nation, or any other differentiating factor. Socialism, in essence, seeks to eliminate individuality in favor of communal thinking. It is not 'my' - it is 'our.' It is not 'I' - it is 'we.' No individual's success is celebrated - any achievement is everyone's achievement.


"The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property." -- Karl Marx

Socialism, very closely tied to Communism (and having that as its goal, according to Lenin), seeks the elimination of the concept of private property. Private property means that some have what others do not. That sort of thing makes people see some things as "theirs." Not what you want if you want people to be happy while the fruits of their labors are taken and "redistributed" to others. Socialism advocates 'work for use, not for profit.'


"Without doubt, machinery has greatly increased the number of well-to-do idlers." - Karl Marx

Socialism seeks to employ everyone - for the good of 'society.' People do not work for their own success. They do not keep their own profits. The government knows best how to distribute the goods and funds achieved.


"Religion is the impotence of the human mind to deal with occurrences it cannot understand." "Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people [masses]." - Karl Marx

Socialism has a deep and abiding contempt for religion. Functionally, this makes sense. Socialism, like Communism, requires an individual to see nothing as higher than 'society' or 'the state.' Religion teaches a higher value, and a specific set of morals. When religion conflicts with the state, religion views itself as higher. After all, you're talking about eternity versus a fleeting time on Earth. Where religion flourishes, Socialism and Communism historically have not.

New versions of Socialism, or "Democratic Socialism," add in the responsibility to love the Earth, to protect the environment, etc. (Can you say, Kyoto?)

There are other basic tenets, each of them scary. Socialism espouses a hatred of violence and war. Nothing is worth fighting for, because everyone is exactly the same, and has exactly the same things. Individual freedom is nonexistent; it is replaced by communal achievement. And how could a truly Socialist society allow private gun ownership? That would make some citizens capable of enforcing their will - or defending themselves from others seeing to do so.

Socialism, as Ayn Rand describes it, "is the doctrine that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that his life and his work do not belong to him, but belong to society, that the only justification of his existence is his service to society, and that society may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good." In other words, Socialism is the antithesis of the principles this country was founded on.

Of utmost importance to our founding fathers was the right to own property. Also highly prized were freedom of speech, assembly, and religion. Under Socialism and Communism, those are smothered - they have to be.

This is the government we as a country have now chosen. It is not a mandate; it was not a landslide. But it was a choice for change, all right, and a scary one for people who believe as I do:

"You cannot bring prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot help small men by tearing down big men.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.
You cannot help the poor man by destroying the rich.
You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than your income.
You cannot further brotherhood of men by inciting class hatred.
You cannot establish security on borrowed money.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away man's initiative and independence.
You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves."
-- Rev. William J. H. Boetcker

Hang on to your Bibles (or whatever else represents your religious beliefs), your guns, and your wallets, folks - this could be a wild ride.

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, October 31, 2008

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

My Two Cents: The End is Nigh?

So here we are, less than a week from an election that could quite literally mean the end of the United States of America as we know her. Paranoia? Perhaps. I never would have believed that my nation could truly be on the verge of voting itself out of existence. But here we are.

The golden child of this presidential election has deep, obvious cracks in his hallowed facade. There are signs that few could miss if they actually look - signs that indicate severe issues. Besides his associations with radicals and terrorists, there are scores of trouble markers.

He appears not to care who supports him. His website does not utilize credit card matching for donations; a test using the names Osama bin Laden, John Galt, and Saddam Hussein to make donations with the same credit card revealed that all the donations went through. In fact, a lot of interesting people have been donating to Obama; and foreign credit are also being accepted. Donations have come from Palestine. Good Will, Loving, and Dela Ware have also made donations. Obama also accepts donations from largely untraceable pre-paid credit cards. His campaign’s response to questions was that “no campaign can fully insulate itself” from these types of issues. John McCain and Hillary Clinton used computer matching (ABS) and citizenship checks for their donations. Obama checks neither.

Barack Obama reflects the far Left in this country - a political sect that wants to cut the military 25% during a time of war. He advocates negotiating with dictators who vow to see Israel and the United States eradicated. He goes to a country where we are fighting a war, and urges them to delay a deal on withdrawal of American troops - so that he can be sure to get the credit for that withdrawal.

Barack Obama doesn’t want you to use his middle name. He doesn’t want you to ask questions about his Marxist leanings, or his radical ties. Yes, he advocates redistribution of wealth, and thinks it’s too bad that the essential restraints of the Constitution limit the ability to act at will. Yes, he intentionally (and “carefully”) chose Marxist professors and friends. But don’t call him a Marxist. Don’t call him a Socialist - or you will be banned from any contact. Yes, he has ties to terrorists. But don’t talk about it. Don’t dare ask about it.

If you do, like "Joe the Plumber," you may find your DMV and other government files illegally accessed, and your life open to investigation. You may, like Sarah Palin, find your private email hacked and published. You may, like reporter Barbara West, be denied any further access to the campaign. Don’t cross the line, or you will see the consequences. And the Left doesn’t just want to restrict certain speech - it wants to go much further. The Left seeks to mandate speech (the Fairness Doctrine). The Left seeks to ensure that you hear what it wants you to hear - and only what it wants you to hear. If the Fairness Doctrine passes, blogs like mine may be required to publish “both sides” of the story. Even if “both sides” means the truth, and the lie from the Left. I have already decided that I will not comply. If I maintained a bigger blog, with a larger audience and a voice that might make a difference, I might openly defy the order. Realistically, though, I’m not that big. I will simply cease to blog. Much bigger voices may be silenced - the prime target of the Fairness Doctrine is talk radio. Barack Obama may not be a leading voice for the Fairness Doctrine, but if the Left has the House, the Senate, and the White House, do you really think that it won’t get passed? Can you see him using a presidential veto to prevent it?

Barack Obama wants you to stay away from examining his wife’s anti-American statements, associations, or political leanings. He says that family is off limits. Unless, of course, you’re talking about his opponent’s family. How has this campaign been to Sarah Palin’s family? To John McCain’s wife? The press is almost universally in the tank for Obama. CNN distorts quotes to portray Sarah Palin as negatively as possible. Other outlets refuse to cover stories that are negative to Obama - even to the point of refusing to release a tape where his own words might harm his campaign. Those who expose him are detained by countries where he has ties. How do you think people who oppose him will be treated once he is in power?

Barack Obama promises that the poor downtrodden masses will be lifted up, and that the evil rich will be taken off their pedestals. So did Lenin. Barack Obama promises that he will cut taxes for 95% of Americans. But only about half of those he’s promising tax cuts to actually pay taxes. Barack Obama will take your money and decide that someone else who has less deserves it - though you’re the one who worked for it. From each according to his ability; to each according to his need - not his worth, but his need.

Barack Obama promises to restore our standing in the world. We will be liked by a world filled with terrorists, socialists, communists, sellouts, and radicals. What will we have to sell to earn their praise? What is the value of our soul?

Well, it’ll only be four years, you might say. Eight, at most. And then the Left will have screwed things up so badly that they’ll be out of power for a long time. Maybe. But maybe not. During beloved Bill Clinton’s presidency, there was a movement to lift presidential term limits. It died then, but now there’s precedent. In New York, a lifting of term limits is allowing Bloomberg to run again (despite two referendums enforcing a two-term limit). After four years of nothing but positive press, nothing but the pap of propaganda, who will there be to oppose lifting presidential term limits?

If elected, Barack Obama has the potential to make us long for the good old days of Jimmy Carter. A Barack Obama presidency will be far, far worse. For the first time, we will have a socialist president, presiding over a legislature where the Democrats - a party with a significant number of like-minded socialists - rule.

The Republicans, with few exceptions, don’t have the guts to stand up to him. Even if they did, it would likely not do much good - they will not even be able to count on the filibuster. We are headed for a period of time where the checks and balances that form the basis of this government may mean nothing. Elect him, and we will likely have a Socialist president, a rubber-stamping Socialist legislature, and eventually, a rubber-stamping Socialist Supreme Court. We also have a fawning, socialist media - the type that refuses to air a tape in which Barack Obama praises PLO-linked Rashid Khalidi as having views that “the whole world“ should hear (for example, that Israel should be obliterated).

How much damage do you think all of that can do in four years? Eight years? Longer?

Recently, a growing chorus of voices are priming the pump. How bad is socialism, really? Would it be so bad to be liked by other nations? Would it be so bad to have those less fortunate lifted up? Would it be so bad if we tried something different? But the beautiful picture they paint of socialism is, and has always been, a lie. And make no mistake - Barack Obama is a liar. He is, like many charismatic leaders before him, one person on the surface, and another when you look any further. Barack Obama is a socialist. He is a radical. He is dangerous. And if he is elected, it could very well mark the beginning of the end for this country as she was meant to be. He says that his opposition is trying to scare you. It doesn’t take that much effort. He’s a pretty scary person.

Some elements of the Left will tell you that to not vote for him means that you’re a racist. But just because they say something, it doesn’t make it true - the Truth and the Left aren’t close friends anyway. I am not voting for him because I am an anti-socialist. I view redistribution of wealth as an evil. I view unbridled altruism as evil. I view restriction of free speech as a violation of the principles on which this country was founded - principles which formed the basis of the greatest form of government to ever exist on Earth. I define social justice as ensuring that everyone gets a fair shake - that they rise or fail based solely on their own merits - and not because someone propped them up or ensured that they would have what someone else earned. I am not voting for him because I believe him to be a radical, diametrically opposed to what this country stands for - or used to, anyway. I view him as someone who will sell our country out to whomever he sees fit. I am not voting for him because anyone who would enter into a dialogue with Iran deserves contempt, not a seat in the highest office in the land. I am not voting for him because he lacks the character and qualifications to be president.

Maybe the country that I believe in is already gone. Maybe political correctness, socialism, and self-loathing are the values of the new America. I hope not. I hope that this country takes a long look at Barack Obama before next Tuesday, and realizes the threat that he poses to its survival.

We will know shortly. We have already started down the slope, but our fingers are still desperately clinging on the edge. Take a moment to fix in your mind the country you have on Monday. You may never see it again.

Paranoia, maybe. But then again, maybe not.

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, August 23, 2008

OK, it's Official - We are in the End Times

Either that, or I'm in Hell.

CNN and Fox are both confirming that Obama has chosen Joe Biden as his running mate.

Funny, and you thought that "articulate and clean" thing was actually snobby and obnoxious. Apparently it was actually kind and endearing in Obsma's world.

Who knew?

There just is not enough alcohol in the world for this one.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Barack Obama Has the Sixth Sense - Who Knew?

Barack Obama is apparently ready to tell us his secret.

He sees dead people:

"On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes -- and I see many of them in the audience here today -- our sense of patriotism is particularly strong."

{CHORTLE}

Sorry. Couldn't help it.

It's worth noting that his gaffe is conveniently absent from the speech posted on his website. Those are just the prepared remarks, and who prepares to sound like an idiot?

Want to watch the clip? Here you go:



There is much liberal excuse-making for the gaffe, including the ever-popular 'he's just tired,' and a little tossing around of possible 'videoshopping.'

Wonder if a Republican would get the same latitude?

Doubt it.

On the good side, though, B-HO's vision of dead Heroes in the audience doesn't make him nearly as big a dumb@$$ as Jimmy Carter.

So he's got that going for him.

Predictably, though, the media's only focus this morning is Hillary's 'assassination' comment. Tasteless, maybe. But if the MSM hadn't dumped her for he-whose-middle-name-shall-not-be-mentioned, something tells me you wouldn't have heard about the remark at all.

Well, at least while this country is politically swirling around the bowl, we've got plenty to laugh at.

UPDATE:
Obama's got some issues with history, too - he recently told a story of his uncle liberating Auschwitz with U.S. forces. Problem is that the Soviets liberated Auschwitz.

I could allow for the fact that he just misstated the camp name...if he hadn't told the same story some time ago. Only this time, it was that the relative (who he alternately names as his uncle or his grandfather) heard the tales from the troops who had liberated Treblinka and Auschwitz, not that he'd been there.

And if you check out the link above in this update, you'll find out that Barack's mother was an only child. Apparently, his great-uncle was in the service, so maybe that's it. But that still doesn't fix the grandfather reference. And if his great-uncle and his grandfather are the same person, well, I just don't even want to go there.

Of course, there's also the possibility that he's just outright lying, and that next week, his great uncle will have - a la Dr.Evil's father - invented the question mark.

Somebody ought to get me some sort of flow chart to follow this one.


UPDATE #2: Obama has now apologized for his error. Seems the deal is that it's the great-uncle and Buchenwald.

Anyone for the great-grandfather's uncle and Buchenwitz?

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Um....Yeah....



I can allow for exhaustion and brain fry. I travel a lot for work, and some days, you just get real tired, and more than a little punchy.


But if a Republican said this, it would be political death. And if McCain did this, it would be plastered all over the media as an age thing.

The other thing is, being President is a demanding job. If this is the kind of mistake he makes because he's tired from campaigning, I get a little worried about what could happen when he's tired and in office....

Labels: ,

Friday, March 07, 2008

You Can't Make This Stuff Up - Qaddafi Duck Rides Again

Seems the Dems are getting a little bit of campaign advice from none other than Qaddafi Duck:

Libyan strongman Col. Muammar al-Qaddafi weighed in on America's presidential campaign, specifically commenting on both Democratic rivals' repeated calls for "change."

"I've seen that in America, a candidate who wants people to vote for him keeps talking about change," Qaddafi said earlier this week in a televised address on Libyan TV, an obvious reference to Barack Obama.
How flippin' sad does your platform have to be if Muammar "holy-crap-they-just-dropped-bombs-on-my-house" al-Qaddafi can recognize you've got nothing to stand on??

But Moammar has the solution:

Qaddafi offered up Libya as a model for "change," predicting that "the whole world will return to the model of the republic of the masses, to communes, to popular security, to popular defense, to popular capitalism, and to popular socialism.
Popular socialism - now there's an idea the Dems can get behind.

Maybe he should send a resume to Obama - after all, he's down one advisor.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Could Someone Tell Barack It Was AAZ That Got Us Into Iraq, Not WMDs - And Pass It On To Hillary

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Two presidential hopefuls, Republican John McCain and Democrat Barack Hussein Obama, are trading shots on what could, would or should be done in the future regarding the Battle for Iraq in the War on Terror.

Obama said during a debate with his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, that he wants US troops out of Iraq yesterday, but might send them back in "If Al Qaeda is trying to establish a base in Iraq."

That in itself is a less than rousing statement, but wait, there's more.

McCain responded during a campaign speech that Barack should have known that Al Qaeda already is in Iraq, and we have to deal with that reality. McCain added, and I am paraphrasing here, that surrender is not an option.

Barack then said in response that the only reason Al Qaeda is in Iraq in the first place is because George Bush and John McCain started a war there.

And that my friends is where Barack Hussein Obama dug himself into a hole he will never be able to get out of, regardless of whether or not he gets the Democratic nomination.



Read the Rest, at Winter's Soldier Story

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Stumping, Selma-Style

OK, I refuse to stoop to the level of unloading on Hillary for her little speech in the church over the weekend, and I refuse to rant about Barack Obama's oh-wouldn't-this-disappoint-Biden-ish comments during the same weekend in Selma, AL. No, I'm not going to spend a couple thousand words on how condescending all of this is, and how if you look at it, you'll see just how hypocritical the Left really is...



...mostly because I can't stop laughing long enough.

Labels: , , , ,

nocashfortrash.org