Recently, information has begun to surface about the presence of WMD's in Iraq, and documentation of a connection between Saddam and the Taliban.

So what is going to happen to the moonbat anti-war cry? They've been saying that:

1. There were no WMDs in Iraq
(something I've said was highly debatable from the start - what about Halabja? What about the items previously disclosed that were found? What about reports from his own generals that such things existed?)

2. There was no connection between Saddam and 9/11, so Iraq had nothing to do with the War on Terror
I've always said that although no direct connection had ever been absolutely proven, there was strong evidence of a Saddam-AlQaeda meeting, and documented proof that Hussein was paying bounties to the families of suicide bombers. And if it's AlQaeda in Iraq that's causing most of the problems over there, how is there NO connection???

Well, skewering the "Bush Lied, they Died" retro-moonbat jingle is a whole heap of information now being disclosed.

Hundreds of WMD's discovered:
Report: WMDs Found in Iraq
Senator Santorum Makes Major Announcement Regarding Newly Declassified Information Concerning Chemical Weapons Discovered in Iraq
Evidence Provides Further Insight into Saddam Hussein's WMD (pdf) (from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence)
Key Points of the National Ground Intelligence Center's report (pdf)
Santorum and Hoekstra on WMD's (transcript - word document)

Iraq and the Taliban with a direct connection
Documents Support Saddam-Taliban Connection
Documenting Saddam's Link to Terror

Hmmmmm....so who lied?

What's the next anti-war shriek? Leave your guess in the comments section.

Me, I'm for having 'em all wear t-shirts that say "I'm with stupid."